Preview

Yearbook Japan

Advanced search

Continental Policy of Japan as Seen from France: From Manchurian Incident to China Incident

https://doi.org/10.24411/2687-1432-2020-10010

Abstract

This article analyzes the responses of French analysts and journalists to a then new phase of Japanese expansion into China known as the Manchurian Incident and to a new balance of power after the establishment of the puppet-state Manchukuo under the total control of Japan. The League of Nations as well as the governments of almost all Great Powers condemned Japan’s action as aggression and violation of international law, but French analysts, first of all thinking about preserving and strengthening the country’s position in French Indochina, discussed the arguments of both sides according to their own political positions. A former legal advisor to several Chinese national governments Professor Jean Escarra simply ignored Manchukuo’s existence. Legal advisor of the Japanese embassy in Paris, Doctor of Law Jean Ray called Manchukuo “an experience worth being attempted and helped”. Doctor of Law A.R. Tullie viewed Manchukuo’s establishment as fully legal and according to the Nine Powers Treaty of 1922. Known for her critical attitude to militarism and colonialism, the “queen of great reportage” Andree Viollis (1870-1950) in her books Shanghai and China s Destiny (1933) and Japan and Her Empire (1933), written after visiting China and Japan, considered the broadening of the Japanese expansion into China as a manifestation of “fascist” (radical Nationalist and conservative-revolutionary) tendencies inside the country and also gave a sarcastic description of Japanese attempts to look like Europeans in her book Intimate Japan (1934). Journalist Maurice Lachin (1909-1977) visited Japan, Korea, and Manchukuo, talked to well-informed and influential people and was able to produce a full-scale panorama of the current situation with quite objective analysis according to the traditions of the “great reportage” in his book Japan 1934 (1934). Secretary of the Committee for Pacific Problems Study Roger Levy (1887-1975) became highly valued as a good expert on the Far Eastern situation after a series of works with an “equidistant” view of the Sino-Japanese conflict. A study of French opinion and response to the Japanese continental policy will enrich our knowledge of this period and will help us to understand better its political philosophy as well as the working of the propaganda and image-making systems.

About the Author

V. E. Molodyakov
Institute of Oriental Studies RAS; Takushoku University
Russian Federation


References

1. Мещеряков 2006 - Мещеряков А. Н. Император Мэйдзи и его Япония. Москва: Наталис, 2006.

2. Молодяков 1999 - Молодяков В. Э. Консервативная революция в Японии: идеология и политика. Москва: Восточная литература, 1999.

3. Молодяков 2019 - Молодяков В. Э. Континентальная политика Японии - взгляд из Франции: «Маньчжурский инцидент» и «дуэль юристов». Япония. Ежегодник. 2019. Т. 48. Москва: АИРО-XXI, 2019. С. 228-249.

4. Молодяков 2020 - Молодяков В. Э. Государство Маньчжоу-го глазами французских аналитиков: от «Маньчжурского инцидента» (1931) до «Китайского инцидента» (1937). Уральское востоковедение. Ежегодник. 2020. Т. 10. Екатеринбург: УрФУ, 2020. C. 55-65.

5. Стимсон 1938 - Стимсон Г. Л. Дальневосточный кризис. Воспоминания и наблюдения. Москва: Соцэкгиз, 1938.

6. Escarra 1933 - Escarra, J. Le Conflit Sino-Japonais et la Societé des Nations. Ray J. La Position, l’Oeuvre et la Politique du Japon en Mandchourie. Paris: Publications de la Conciliation Internationale, 1933.

7. Jeandel 2006 - Jeandel, A.-A. Andrée Viollis: une Femme Grand Reporter, une Écriture de l’Événement 1927-1939. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2006.

8. Lachin 1934 - Lachin, M. Japon 1934. Paris: Gallimard, 1934.

9. Les Сonséquences 1936 - Les Сonséquences du Dévelopement Économique du Japon pour l’Empire Français. Paris: C.E.P.E.; Paul Hartmann, 1936.

10. Lévy 1932 - Lévy, R. A qui la Mandchourie? Paris: A. Pedone, 1932.

11. Lévy 1935 - Lévy, R. Extreme-Orient et Pacifique. Paris: Armand Coline, 1935.

12. Lévy 1938 - Lévy, R. Relations de la Chine et du Japon. Paris: C.E.P.E.; Paul Hartmann, 1938.

13. Tullié <1935> - Tullié, A. R. La Mandchourie et le Conflit Sino-Japonais devant la Société des Nations. Paris: Recueil Sirey, <1935>.

14. Vèvre 1932 - Vèvre, E. de. La reconnaissance de jure de la régence de Mandchourie et le traité des neuf puissances. Paris: Arthur Rousseau, 1932.

15. Viollis 1933a - Viollis, A. Changhai et le Destin de la Chine. Paris: Corrêa 1933.

16. Viollis 1933b - Viollis, A. Le Japon et son Empire. Paris: Grasset, 1933.

17. Viollis 1934 - Viollis, A. Le Japon Intime. Paris: Fernand Aubier, 1934.


Review

For citations:


Molodyakov V.E. Continental Policy of Japan as Seen from France: From Manchurian Incident to China Incident. Yearbook Japan. 2020;49:253-273. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2687-1432-2020-10010

Views: 211


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2687-1432 (Print)
ISSN 2687-1440 (Online)